Dec 23 2009
Some Chilling Global Warming Reading
There’s plenty of chatter about global warming as we head into Christmas and, in many places, a cold winter season. A couple points worth checking out to remember that, despite some important emails recently brought to light apparently showing efforts by climate scientists to stoke public fears, the public fear frenzy over global warming is still heating up:
- Total Recall: Governor Schwarzenegger Demands All Californians Fight Global Warming
- Now we’re to worry about acidic oceans, “The ‘evil twin’ of warming”
- VaclevKlaus Says Global Warming “New Religion”
Meanwhile, the continuing effort to turn children into eco-zombies continues through your local mall. Build-A-Bear has released this video:
Maura Flynn is all over the issue at BigGovernment.com, where she writes in favor of a boycott:
Needless-to-say, this constitutes brainwashing on the sleaziest and most sinister level. The good news is that this nonsense isn’t coming from our government this time and the rocky economy is our friend here. People, we have the means, if we have the will, to topple these charlatans who shamelessly prey on little children. So boycott Build-A-Bear. And, more importantly, tell the world why.
Then again, there is this fascinating poll from the Great White North:
The Harper government might not lose many votes over its controversial stance on climate change even though half of Canadians disapprove of its policies, says a new poll.
The survey, conducted over the past few days by Innovative Research Group for Canwest News Service, found 49 per cent of respondents disapproved of the government’s position at the Copenhagen climate conference, but 44 per cent said it would not make a difference on whether they were more or less likely to vote for the Conservatives.




If a referendum of the worlds population was asked, “Should the world continue growing as it has done over the last 20 years” with only 2 results, Yes or No. What would the result be? (Assuming every world citizen was in a position and allowed to vote)
We all know that it is not possible, resources, populations, water, food, etc. So what should we do? If countries could obtain benefits from making changes, would they?
I have an idea as a private world citizen, that is worth talking about at http://climate-comments.blogspot.com/
Drachsi